Username:
B
I
U
S
"
url
img
#
code
sup
sub
font
size
color
smiley
embarassed
thumbsup
happy
Huh?
Angry
Roll Eyes
Undecided
Lips Sealed
Kiss
Cry
Grin
Wink
Tongue
Shocked
Cheesy
Smiley
Sad
<- 1  -   of 40 ->
--
--
List results:
Search options:
Use \ before commas in usernames
On the RE4 page

Best The Another Order new game plus time: Japanese version 0:27:53  by You-Hei 'Cab' Muro on 2007-09-13.

It needs to be listed as the Japanese PS2 version.
train kept rollin
Pokemon Colloseum was definitely not released in 1994. pehaps 2004?
destroy them with lazers
Released in 2004 for the Gamecube, Pokemon Colosseum is the first true Pokemon RPG made that shows the title creature fighting in full 3-D. Develpoed by Genius Sonority instead of the usual Pokemon guys at Game Freak, the oddly spelled Pokemon Colloseum features a trainer who has recently broken away from his membership in a rough and tumble Pokemon gang and sets out to capture and purify the shadow Pokemon of the world.

some minor typos
Fucking Weeaboo
On the Castlevania Chronicles page, I completed the Block 4 run on 2010-01-25 as well, not the current date listed.
Haters gonna hate
Embarrassing typos (wrote that one in a hurry if you couldn't tell), links, and dates all fixed.
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
On the download page for the Syfa run of Castlevania III, the low quality version is said to be 4.3 MB. It should be 43.4 MB.
There's an "alot" in the middle of the game description paragraph for Prinny: Can I Really Be The Hero?
http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2010/04/alot-is-better-than-you-at-everything.html

Edit: There are four more alots in the run comments.
Edit history:
TheVoid: 2010-06-19 09:47:18 am
There's also a space missing between ":" and "C" in "Prinny:Can I Really Be the Hero?" in the description.

EDIT: And in the description of Castlevania: The Adventure ReBirth there's a space too much in "WiiWare title , Castlevania: The".
Haters gonna hate
Spacing fixed, and the alot in the description has been sent packing (and that link is hilarious kareshi).  Left the alots in the comments because, well, they're his comments.  I'll fix them if he requests it.
The following might not even be a typo, but I noticed that in the Tetris Attack run page it says cyghfer got his run in 2009-03-29, is the run really that "old" or is it from 2010?

Thanks.

BTW, enjoyed the run and commentary cyghfer Smiley
Yeah, that date would be even before the older run was completed! Glad you liked them both spac, though I hope you didn't cringe too much when I did the mock voice :x
also, 'embedded' is spelled incorrectly in the tetris attack description (that's 3 misspellings related to my run - must be a conspiracy ..!)
Edit history:
andrewg: 2010-06-22 03:50:34 pm
Hi! I'm andrewg!
On the game list it says "Addams Family NES" <- the NES shouldn't be there. For consistency it should read: "Addams Family, The"
Fucking Weeaboo
Quote from cyghfer:
also, 'embedded' is spelled incorrectly in the tetris attack description (that's 3 misspellings related to my run - must be a conspiracy ..!)


More like that's what happens when breakdown updates sooner then the usual 7-9 day mark.
Haters gonna hate
Quote from Lord_VG:
More like that's what happens when breakdown updates sooner then the usual 7-9 day mark.


Indeed, hit a point with this one where it was either go to bed or finish last night.  Chose the latter, and proofreading suffered.

But anyways, stuff's fixed.
Hi! I'm andrewg!
http://speeddemosarchive.com/Mario64.html

I just realized something. Super Mario 64 (the DS version) is not at all the same as Super Mario 64. It should have gotten its own game page.
Exoray
Quote from andrewg:
http://speeddemosarchive.com/Mario64.html

I just realized something. Super Mario 64 (the DS version) is not at all the same as Super Mario 64. It should have gotten its own game page.

There's a long discussion regarding that somewhere. I believe the final wording was that it should be on the same page due to it being a remake (although with some added content).
Hi! I'm andrewg!
Quote from moooh:
Quote from andrewg:
http://speeddemosarchive.com/Mario64.html

I just realized something. Super Mario 64 (the DS version) is not at all the same as Super Mario 64. It should have gotten its own game page.

There's a long discussion regarding that somewhere. I believe the final wording was that it should be on the same page due to it being a remake (although with some added content).


there are a lot of differences though. I mean, it has 4 characters, you need 80 stars to complete the game... etc.
Exoray
Found one of the reasonings behind it
http://speeddemosarchive.com/forum/index.php?topic=10761.0
Hi! I'm andrewg!
Yea so basically it was done for no purpose more than "it's easier this way"... It's still WRONG though. :/
Edit history:
Alice: 2010-06-24 07:22:49 pm
I believe the point is that the two games aren't being considered in the same categories but are too similar to warrant seperate pages; unless the game is truly completely different, it really shouldn't warrant five different listings for five different remakes.

An example of "truly completely different" might be something like Ys: the Oath in Felghana compared back to Ys III: Wanderers from Ys; also Kingdom Hearts: Re:Chain of Memories, but I haven't played that so maybe it's not so different.

At any rate, don't expect a seperate page for OoT 3DS no matter the circumstances.
train kept rollin
just noticed this in the age of empires III descripiton

  "It has a completely linear single-player campaign, and the multiplayer system."
Quote from Pootrain:
just noticed this in the age of empires III descripiton

  "It has a completely linear single-player campaign, and the multiplayer system."


I'm not even sure what that's supposed to say.
Quote from ExplodingCabbage:
I'm not even sure what that's supposed to say.
I'm guessing... it's a form of criticism. Wink