Mirror's Edge - July 20, 2015

Edit history:

SDAVerification: 2015-07-20 04:39:18 am

2015-06-23 10:16:45 am

Game Page: http://speeddemosarchive.com/MirrorsEdge.html

Mirror's Edge (pc) (pc) [Any %] [Single Segment]

Decision: Accept

Congratulations to 'Req'!

Thread title:

SDAVerification

2015-06-23 10:16:46 am

Run Information

Mirror's Edge (pc) (pc) [Any %] [Single Segment]

Verification Files

http://v.speeddemosarchive.com/MirrorsEdge-20150612/

Please refer to the Verification Guidelines before posting. Verifications are due by July 7, 2015.

Please post your opinions about the run and be certain to conclude your post with a verdict (Accept/Reject). This is not a contest where the majority wins - I will judge each verification on its content. Please keep your verification brief unless you have a good reason otherwise.

After 2 weeks I will read all of the verifications and move this thread to the main verification board and post my verdict.

Soliduz Znake

Edit history:

Soliduz Znake: 2015-06-27 03:56:43 am

Soliduz Znake: 2015-06-27 03:53:58 am

2015-06-27 03:53:51 am

A/V: good
cheating: none
some mistakes not entirely on the runner's fault. at 2:44 got stunned yet the next try she took damage but no stun while jumping. at 22:18 took the runner 4 tries to get on top. at 40:26 failed jump. the video ended before the ending/credits, not sure about this one. overall not a bad run even though the runner comment says its bad (or just being sarcastic) but improvement by 17 minutes. I timed the run from when runner has control at 0:10 to 40:45 as soon she grabs the red railing so 40:35.
Accept

Judgy

2015-06-30 01:55:50 am

Borderlands 2 Glitch Hunter/ router.

A/V: Good
Cheating: None
Game-play: there are a few mistakes or unfortunate situations where the game doesn't comply, biggest ones are as Soliduz mentioned above, it a solid run for a game with as many tricks as this one has you can expect a few not to go perfectly smoothly in a SS run, the failed jump at the end make me wanna BibleThump Sad

accept (but hoping for an improvement which I'm sure will come given time Cheesy

)

Eternalspirit

2015-07-04 08:30:00 pm

Couple of face palm moments for sure but otherwise seems fine. I'll accept.

Efreeti

Edit history:

Efreeti: 2015-07-13 03:54:52 pm

2015-07-13 03:54:31 pm

Clear as a crisp spring morning!

Quite a few flubs and deaths, so lots of room for improvement, but it's a good effort, the runner uses the wall kick glitch like a pro and the OOB was done quick. I do believe runs should be a bit more polished though. And even the runner admits it was a bad run?

I will say accept, but only with the hope that the room for improvement sparks competition.

If we had any indication the runner submitting the best time they had so far though knowing it was flawed and wanted to later submit an improved run themselves, I would reject this.

SDAVerification

2015-07-20 04:39:20 am

Decision posted.