Temple of Elemental Evil - June 6th, 2013

Flip

Edit history:

Flip: 2013-06-06 01:44:03 pm

2013-05-21 11:09:56 am

1-Up!

Game Page: Doesn't exist yet

Temple of Elemental Evil (Any %) (Single Segment) [Bad Ending]

Decision: Accept

Congratulations to Maik 'Onin' Biekart!

Thread title:

Flip

2013-05-21 11:09:57 am

1-Up!

Run Information

Temple of Elemental Evil (Any %) (Single Segment) [Bad Ending]

Verification Files

http://v.speeddemosarchive.com/ToEEFinal_IQ.mp4

Please refer to the Verification Guidelines before posting. Verifications are due by June 4, 2013.

Please post your opinions about the run and be certain to conclude your post with a verdict (Accept/Reject). This is not a contest where the majority wins - I will judge each verification on its content. Please keep your verification brief unless you have a good reason otherwise.

After 2 weeks I will read all of the verifications and move this thread to the main verification board and post my verdict.

Pjoxt

2013-05-21 04:08:21 pm

Yes, I'm a wizard.

A/V is good and it doesn't look like there were any mistakes, planning or execution wise.

Accept.

UraniumAnchor

2013-05-24 11:55:26 pm

Not a walrus

Stabbing drunks and stealing their jewelry. I approve. Video quality excellent, can't really comment on the bugs since I've never played the game myself but it seems reasonable enough.

Accept.

LotBlind

2013-05-25 10:51:32 am

A/V good, no signs of cheating. I guess the publishing encode will include ending cinematics. Solid-looking run.

Accept.

Flip

2013-06-06 01:44:12 pm

1-Up!

Decision posted.

Onin

2013-06-06 03:40:32 pm

I need to stop running games that no one has ever played Cheesy

UraniumAnchor

2013-06-06 03:42:17 pm

Not a walrus

Hey, you had one guy offer to verify. (Who strangely enough didn't write anything...)

KennyMan666

2013-06-06 04:20:53 pm

Precursor

From IRC, it seems the guy who signed up as a verifier didn't ever notice it went to public verification and was confused about this verification topic being posted, since he was accepted as a veririfer.

So, maybe that should be a thing: If a game that actually has a verifier or two gets sent to public verification instead, the signed up verifiers get told about that.

UraniumAnchor

2013-06-06 04:24:06 pm

Not a walrus

I'd rather people just pay more attention to the Public Verification forum, but if it comes up again I'll give it more consideration.

Eternalspirit

2013-06-06 04:40:59 pm

I wanted to verify this (I wasn't the guy who signed up to do so), bought the game, but then Dark Souls got in the way.

From what I've played of it so far, the DnD concepts are cool but the controls are so, so, so bad..

Onin

Edit history:

Onin: 2013-06-06 04:54:50 pm

2013-06-06 04:54:33 pm

The controls aren't the absolute worst, especially when you realize ctrl+[key] can keybind abilities, but I hated the awful balance and the complete lack of direction. I had absolutely no idea what to do at any point of the game on my initial playthrough.

Eternalspirit

2013-06-06 08:13:08 pm

If I ever get around to beating the game, I will definitely be using that crazy stats glitch you found and a walkthrough.. Tongue

Efreeti

2013-06-07 04:36:34 am

Clear as a crisp spring morning!

Yeah I signed up to verify, but I hadn't been checking the public verifications. I downloaded the run and checked it out though, and I'd accept it too.
I've beaten the game several times. Knowledge of D&D 3.5 edition definitely helps.