Taz Express - January 26, 2016

Edit history:

SDAVerification: 2016-01-26 02:15:15 pm

2016-01-12 10:46:25 am

Game Page: Doesn't exist yet

Taz Express (pal) (n64) [Any %] [Single Segment]
Taz Express (pal) (n64) [Any %] [Single Segment] [New Game+]

Decision: Accept

Congratulations to 'Pottoww'!

Thread title:

SDAVerification

2016-01-12 10:46:26 am

Run Information

Taz Express (pal) (n64) [Any %] [Single Segment] [New Game+]
Taz Express (pal) (n64) [Any %] [Single Segment]

Verification Files

http://v.speeddemosarchive.com/tazexpress-any-newgame-v_HQ.mp4
http://v.speeddemosarchive.com/tazexpress-any-v_HQ.mp4

Please refer to the Verification Guidelines before posting.

Please post your opinions about the run and be certain to conclude your post with a verdict (Accept/Reject). This is not a contest where the majority wins - I will judge each verification on its content. Please keep your verification brief unless you have a good reason otherwise.

ktwo

2016-01-16 05:17:50 am

When I saw that this was an Infogramme game, I know I had to check these runs out. I hadn't seen the game before, but I have played through a couple of Infogramme games, which I think is relevant to mention...

A/V: Good

Gameplay: There are quite a few mistakes in both runs to the point where it starts to add up. I know how frustrating Infogramme games can be in terms of game mechanics though. This game is no exception and most aspects of it seem to be in the range "poor to terrible", so I guess some of the time losses could be excused. Both of these runs seem well planned and well-rehearsed. While they both look somewhat improvable, I'd still say they are

Accept x2

Soliduz Znake

Edit history:

Soliduz Znake: 2016-01-19 02:44:34 pm

2016-01-16 09:53:58 am

A/V: good
cheating: no
good run, barely any mistakes that seem unacceptable. routing is planned well though the control of Taz seem sometimes out of control.
Accept for NG+

SDAVerification

2016-01-26 02:15:19 pm

Decision posted.