Username:
B
I
U
S
"
url
img
#
code
sup
sub
font
size
color
smiley
embarassed
thumbsup
happy
Huh?
Angry
Roll Eyes
Undecided
Lips Sealed
Kiss
Cry
Grin
Wink
Tongue
Shocked
Cheesy
Smiley
Sad
1 page
--
--
List results:
Search options:
Use \ before commas in usernames
Game Page: Doesn't exist yet

Savant - Ascent (Any %) (Single Segment)

Decision: Reject

Reason: ktwo was able to find a run a minute faster. For a run 7 minutes long, that's too much of a gap.

https://queue.speeddemosarchive.com/queue/verificationfiles/1157/

This run will be available for a month. After that these link(s) will no longer work.
Thread title:  
Run Information

Savant - Ascent (Any %) (Single Segment)

Verification Files

http://v.speeddemosarchive.com/savantascent-v_HQ.mp4

Please refer to the Verification Guidelines before posting. Verifications are due by Sept. 21, 2014.

Please post your opinions about the run and be certain to conclude your post with a verdict (Accept/Reject). This is not a contest where the majority wins - I will judge each verification on its content. Please keep your verification brief unless you have a good reason otherwise.

After 2 weeks I will read all of the verifications and move this thread to the main verification board and post my verdict.
I found a run that was almost a minute faster, http://www.twitch.tv/upinflam3z/c/2687718 (and yes, it's in the same category). There are possibly even faster times, but I just did a lazy google search and all the other speedruns seemed to be ng+. The submitted run isn't bad, even though the death could have been avoided (as seen in the linked run). However, the fact that the run is very short (7 min) and that there is a run that is faster by almost a minute means that the run isn't optimized enough.

Reject
Decision posted.