is myst a good idea

2005-07-02 04:24:29 pm

why doesn't someone do myst I,II or IV (not uru and III)

it would be nice to see the games played quickly, it wouldn't be that hard and could be done in a day

Thread title:

Bp_

2005-07-02 04:43:28 pm

i think II ( raven) should be cool, well i woudl watch it

mist I would be good to cause it is small

still this kind of game isnt skill, its only memorize :\

Allantois

Edit history:

Allantois: 2005-07-02 07:46:36 pm

2005-07-02 07:45:57 pm

The Unreal Authority.

we had a discussion about myst and riven before. I think on myst we decided that it would have to be 100% in that you need to actually get the pages for the books because otherwise you can beat it in a coupple minutes by memorizing the last puzzle. And on these, I agree, its all about memorization.

Ekarderif

2005-07-02 09:23:21 pm

Your almighty lordship

So you're imposing artificial limits to prevent you from beating the game as fast as possible, despite the fact that it was built in from the beginning?

Allantois

2005-07-02 10:15:40 pm

The Unreal Authority.

yeah

thats why I said 100%

a low % run would cosist of doing one puzzle and wow you are done. Not very exciting if you ask me. At that level it doesnt even require much memorization.

booring

randy

2005-07-03 01:00:33 pm

i would like to see myst IV or I the most because i havent seen them.

myst II i have played. but i didn't finish it because i was in that "prison" and then someone came and gave me a linking book. i wasn't paying attention and i didn't realise that this was the prison book... you can guess the rest (and didn't save once)

i didn't want to play it over
so i really want to see the end