Half-Life: Opposing Force

Edit history:

SDAVerification: 2014-06-07 02:42:23 am

2014-05-23 12:35:51 am

Game Page: http://speeddemosarchive.com/HalfLifeOpposingForce.html

Half-Life: Opposing Force (Any %) (Single Segment) [Boot Camp]

Decision: Accept

Congratulations to Paul 'PJC' Connolly!

Thread title:

SDAVerification

2014-05-23 12:35:52 am

Run Information

Half-Life: Opposing Force (Any %) (Single Segment)

Verification Files

http://v.speeddemosarchive.com/bootcampss-v_HQ.mp4

Please refer to the Verification Guidelines before posting. Verifications are due by June 6, 2014.

Please post your opinions about the run and be certain to conclude your post with a verdict (Accept/Reject). This is not a contest where the majority wins - I will judge each verification on its content. Please keep your verification brief unless you have a good reason otherwise.

After 2 weeks I will read all of the verifications and move this thread to the main verification board and post my verdict.

Paperboat

2014-05-24 01:31:08 pm

XCOM Timesheet: http://goo.gl/BWDqbC

Good audio/video and no apparent cheating.

A fairly straightforward run where most of the timesave is on clean movement and occasionally clean shooting. the bhopping is strong for the entire run save for one mess up on basic training. I'd give it an accept.

ktwo

2014-05-31 08:10:53 am

I'll echo what Paperboat said about the run. However, this run is for boot camp, which is some kind of training tutorial. It's not the standard any% and is therefore a different category than the run that's currently hosted on sda.

Accept

ShadowDraft

2014-05-31 08:24:30 am

Get over here!

Quote from ktwo:

I'll echo what Paperboat said about the run. However, this run is for boot camp, which is some kind of training tutorial. It's not the standard any% and is therefore a different category than the run that's currently hosted on sda.

Accept

Yea I was wondering about that too. Though I haven't noticed the runner mentioning this in the comments.

I'd accept this too. Just need to change it to the tutorial run or something.

UraniumAnchor

2014-05-31 09:43:45 am

Not a walrus

It's been fixed in the database. The runner made a note of it in his submission but the run didn't get tagged.

Tezur0

2014-06-01 06:17:26 am

That's pretty clean for SS. was one mistake with hops which I noticed, but w/e.
Audio/video fine.
Accept.

SDAVerification

2014-06-07 02:42:27 am

Decision posted.