1-Up!
Game Page: Doesn't exist yet
Fancy Pants Adventures (Any %) (Single Segment) [World 1]
Verifier Responses
Decision: Accept
Congratulations to 'cooopercrisp!'
Fancy Pants Adventures (Any %) (Single Segment) [World 1]
Verifier Responses
Quote:
This game is a pain to run. It's fast and has slippery controls.
A/V = good. While there is a faster record out there, I believe this is a good example of the best strategies. A very solid run.
Accept.
A/V = good. While there is a faster record out there, I believe this is a good example of the best strategies. A very solid run.
Accept.
Quote:
A/V is very good and I can see no signs of cheating.
I have to be honest here, this is a marginal run for me. As the verifier above me says, FPA is a deceptively hard game to run, requiring a quite bit of luck with the controls at time, meaning that it's very easy to (seemingly) time everything perfect and still have things turn out wrongly, so some lenience on the runner should be given. And don't get me wrong, this is a solid run, executing most of the optimal strategies, few mistakes (barring the penultimate level) and showing that the runner clearly has done quite a bit of training.
However, there's room for improvement, as I'd estimate that an absolutely optimal run could be 8 to 10 seconds faster (barring the discovery of dramatically new strategies) and, more realistically, there's a run out there that's about 4 seconds faster than this one. So although it's a good showcase for the game, because FPA is a very short game (150 seconds from start to finish) and being a bit harsh, it's a weak reject from me, I think that we'd need sub 150 at least to accept.
I have to be honest here, this is a marginal run for me. As the verifier above me says, FPA is a deceptively hard game to run, requiring a quite bit of luck with the controls at time, meaning that it's very easy to (seemingly) time everything perfect and still have things turn out wrongly, so some lenience on the runner should be given. And don't get me wrong, this is a solid run, executing most of the optimal strategies, few mistakes (barring the penultimate level) and showing that the runner clearly has done quite a bit of training.
However, there's room for improvement, as I'd estimate that an absolutely optimal run could be 8 to 10 seconds faster (barring the discovery of dramatically new strategies) and, more realistically, there's a run out there that's about 4 seconds faster than this one. So although it's a good showcase for the game, because FPA is a very short game (150 seconds from start to finish) and being a bit harsh, it's a weak reject from me, I think that we'd need sub 150 at least to accept.
Quote:
Audio Quality: Good
Video Quality: Good
There may be a faster run out there, but this run is solid enough on it's own right.
Accept.
Video Quality: Good
There may be a faster run out there, but this run is solid enough on it's own right.
Accept.
Decision: Accept
Congratulations to 'cooopercrisp!'
Thread title:
