Counter Strike: Condition Zero: Deleted Scenes

Edit history:

SDAVerification: 2014-12-15 05:16:31 pm

2014-12-04 01:38:56 am

Game Page: https://speeddemosarchive.com/CounterStrikeCZDS.html

Counter Strike: Condition Zero: Deleted Scenes (Any %) (Individual Level) (Hard)

Decision: Reject

Reason: Cancelling this submission as the run appears to be substantially improvable.

https://queue.speeddemosarchive.com/queue/verificationfiles/1395/

This run will be available for a month. After that these link(s) will no longer work.

Thread title:

SDAVerification

2014-12-04 01:39:00 am

Run Information

Counter Strike: Condition Zero: Deleted Scenes (Any %) (Individual Level) (Hard)

Verification Files

http://v.speeddemosarchive.com/csczds_recoil/

Please refer to the Verification Guidelines before posting. Verifications are due by Dec. 18, 2014.

Please post your opinions about the run and be certain to conclude your post with a verdict (Accept/Reject). This is not a contest where the majority wins - I will judge each verification on its content. Please keep your verification brief unless you have a good reason otherwise.

After 2 weeks I will read all of the verifications and move this thread to the main verification board and post my verdict.

HoboWithaShotgun

2014-12-05 01:55:24 pm

Wake up and be awesome

Just a question. Was this 1 segment or multi-segement? Because the runner mentions the multi segment of deleted scenes, and I'm not sure if he's referring to the IL table, or his run.

If it is only 1 segment, then this is an easy accept. Execution was solid, and the new discoveries look cool. Dealing with the "hostage" at the end can be a pain, but the runner dealt with him nicely

quadrazid

2014-12-05 04:40:48 pm

Svart Lyser Tronen

Must complain about the video. The higher qualities should be 60fps, but I guess it's not required. Here we have 29.97fps with motion blur. Steam notifications and loading screens left in the video. 4:3 footage in 16:9 video.
The run itself is quite good. A few missing tricks but still roughly 35 seconds faster than the old one.

UraniumAnchor

2014-12-07 10:32:51 am

Not a walrus

If there's frame blurring that's probably unacceptable, especially for a PC game. We'll see if the runner still has clean originals.

Tezur0

Edit history:

Tezur0: 2014-12-07 11:21:27 am

2014-12-07 11:21:01 am

Run itself is really good. Audio - Alright. Video - hm.. I'm not sure if steam notifications is a big of a problem itself aswell as blur, cause it didn't mess anything up, but video is blinking black sometimes, that might be encoding issue, though it wasn't that hard to watch. I'd accept this, though mods might disagree, since they watch for quality more attentively.

coolkid

2014-12-07 07:08:10 pm

I did some attempts and got a run which is roughly 45 seconds faster than yours after a couple of attempts. I attached the demo if you're interested in seeing it and potentially improving your run.

Attachment:

recoil_run_hard.zip

Tezur0

2014-12-08 01:34:03 am

based coolkid

UraniumAnchor

2014-12-11 12:33:06 pm

Not a walrus

So the runner has clean originals but 45 seconds difference on a run this short is probably no good. Where do the differences come from?

t-DcD

Edit history:

t-DcD: 2014-12-11 03:40:23 pm

2014-12-11 02:41:44 pm

Nice !! Thank you coolkid now I have to redo the run, but I go through europe by bike on 28 of December and I don't know if I would have time to redo it. You have good news finds, so if you want the record you have to post this run !

SDAVerification

2014-12-15 05:16:37 pm

Decision posted.