Old Thread
I've been wanting to tackle this one for a while. Damurdoc's run actually pretty solid and well-executed... I especially applaud him for choosing the sorcerer class, as it was clever and worked out surprisingly well.
I'm positive this run could be beaten. Damurdoc plays his strategies well, but fails to utilize some of the game's more obscure and powerful exploits.
Additionally, I plan to do some tests with classes other than sorcerer. The results will determine how much of the run is composed of unique tactics and how much is simply improvement of the existing one.
Ideally someone would finish a run completely through BGII and Throne of Bhall, but my first focus will be without the expansion.
Finally... Damurdoc uses the unpatched 1.0 version of BGII, which seems like a bad move to me. Isnt it assumed that PC games should use the appropriate official patches? Would a run on the patched version be in a different category or the same one?
I've been wanting to tackle this one for a while. Damurdoc's run actually pretty solid and well-executed... I especially applaud him for choosing the sorcerer class, as it was clever and worked out surprisingly well.
I'm positive this run could be beaten. Damurdoc plays his strategies well, but fails to utilize some of the game's more obscure and powerful exploits.
Additionally, I plan to do some tests with classes other than sorcerer. The results will determine how much of the run is composed of unique tactics and how much is simply improvement of the existing one.
Ideally someone would finish a run completely through BGII and Throne of Bhall, but my first focus will be without the expansion.
Finally... Damurdoc uses the unpatched 1.0 version of BGII, which seems like a bad move to me. Isnt it assumed that PC games should use the appropriate official patches? Would a run on the patched version be in a different category or the same one?
Thread title:






