My feelings on The Demon Rush
Game Page: Doesn't exist yet.
Jeff Feasel's run
Verifier Responses
Decision: Accept
Reason: The run is pretty close to the TAS.
Jeff Feasel's run
Verifier Responses
Quote:
After doing a poor job of verifying the earlier Lolo run (accepting it when there were obvious, easy improvements) I decided to watch this one side-by-side with the TAS.
All things considered, the runner did an excellent job. There were a few points where they sacrificed a bit of time for a less-risky strategy, especially later in the run, but nothing major(except maybe room 10-1, but that is late enough in the run to be okay). There were also very few slipups, which likely cost under five seconds all combined.
Basically, while there is of course room for improvement, this run is definitely good enough to accept.
All things considered, the runner did an excellent job. There were a few points where they sacrificed a bit of time for a less-risky strategy, especially later in the run, but nothing major(except maybe room 10-1, but that is late enough in the run to be okay). There were also very few slipups, which likely cost under five seconds all combined.
Basically, while there is of course room for improvement, this run is definitely good enough to accept.
Quote:
Sorry about the delay, I went on vacation and sort of didn't get around to verifying.
There was no cheating, as far as I could tell.
This run has better routes than the previous version, and I have no complaints about any of them. There are some movement errors starting around 8-2, but nothing major. My verdict is a strong accept.
There was no cheating, as far as I could tell.
This run has better routes than the previous version, and I have no complaints about any of them. There are some movement errors starting around 8-2, but nothing major. My verdict is a strong accept.
Quote:
To sum it up, I wish I was more impressed, but it's a solid run and acceptable.
I was surprised to see that you were able to achieve over thirty seconds improvement without using all the strats I suggested. There were a few levels that your execution wasn’t on par with your last submission, but some that were better.
If you used the 8-5 and 10-2 strats it would have saved another 5 or so seconds and you opted not to use them? Oh well, your run is 32 seconds faster and your submission text inaccuracies are fixed.
BTW: 6-1 your route now is correct for 94 steps but you chose to add 1 step for easier turning. It is now equal to your previous route (95 steps), however you execution is right on this time around.
Congrats!
I was surprised to see that you were able to achieve over thirty seconds improvement without using all the strats I suggested. There were a few levels that your execution wasn’t on par with your last submission, but some that were better.
If you used the 8-5 and 10-2 strats it would have saved another 5 or so seconds and you opted not to use them? Oh well, your run is 32 seconds faster and your submission text inaccuracies are fixed.
BTW: 6-1 your route now is correct for 94 steps but you chose to add 1 step for easier turning. It is now equal to your previous route (95 steps), however you execution is right on this time around.
Congrats!
Decision: Accept
Reason: The run is pretty close to the TAS.
Thread title:
