1-Up!
Game Page: Doesn't exist yet
Multiplayer Segmented NG+ run
Verifier Responses
I'm going to do something a little different here and summarize the verification proceedings. The reason being that this has been going on since November, and has included a lot of back and forth, runner to verifier communication, verifier to Flip communication outside of the v thread, and edited posts that I can't grab anymore anyway.
4 verifiers.
3 reject based on a/v issues. None reject based on gameplay issues.
Protocol at this point is to defer to nate, as he makes the final call on whether runs have a/v which is SDA-acceptable. Nate basically built the notion of sda-acceptable video to begin with, so that's why he gets to make these decisions.
One thing is different this time - he's the runner
I'll just say before going forward that I watched this run before sending it out to verifiers and there are some moments where the audio capture is wince-worthy. According to nate, his capture device worked fine in testing but while recording it dropped frames like mad and he was unaware. After the run's completion, he put the audio back together by hand. This results in an audio stretching sound from time to time in most segments.
I went to nate anyway and just asked if he was sure that this was allowable. He's confident that this run is on the lower end of sda-acceptable.
This didn't sit well with the verifiers, who are concerned that we're opening the door to lower quality videos here at SDA. I disagree, and I completely trust nate's judgement. He's been an active admin here longer than any of us and I know he's not going to let our standards slip.
Decision: Accept
Reason: All agree that the planning/execution of this run is excellent. Nate says the a/v issues, while not great, are good enough to be on the site.
Congratulations to Nathan Jahnke and Sarah Jahnke!
Multiplayer Segmented NG+ run
Verifier Responses
I'm going to do something a little different here and summarize the verification proceedings. The reason being that this has been going on since November, and has included a lot of back and forth, runner to verifier communication, verifier to Flip communication outside of the v thread, and edited posts that I can't grab anymore anyway.
4 verifiers.
3 reject based on a/v issues. None reject based on gameplay issues.
Protocol at this point is to defer to nate, as he makes the final call on whether runs have a/v which is SDA-acceptable. Nate basically built the notion of sda-acceptable video to begin with, so that's why he gets to make these decisions.
One thing is different this time - he's the runner
I'll just say before going forward that I watched this run before sending it out to verifiers and there are some moments where the audio capture is wince-worthy. According to nate, his capture device worked fine in testing but while recording it dropped frames like mad and he was unaware. After the run's completion, he put the audio back together by hand. This results in an audio stretching sound from time to time in most segments.
I went to nate anyway and just asked if he was sure that this was allowable. He's confident that this run is on the lower end of sda-acceptable.
This didn't sit well with the verifiers, who are concerned that we're opening the door to lower quality videos here at SDA. I disagree, and I completely trust nate's judgement. He's been an active admin here longer than any of us and I know he's not going to let our standards slip.
Decision: Accept
Reason: All agree that the planning/execution of this run is excellent. Nate says the a/v issues, while not great, are good enough to be on the site.
Congratulations to Nathan Jahnke and Sarah Jahnke!
Thread title: