1-Up!
Game Page: Doesn't exist yet
Intermediate run
Expert run
Verifier Responses
Decision: Accept
Congratulations to Kamil Murański!
Intermediate run
Expert run
Verifier Responses
Quote:
Wow just as good as the runs he posted on Youtube about sometime in September-November. Great job. (no audio video or cheat problems)
Quote:
Video quality is great, no sound obviously.
No cheating found (I guess if that official minesweeper site accepted it, it should be fine anyway)
Quality of the run: GODLIKE
Timing: The timer in the videos seems correct, and is also the time used on www.minesweeper.info.
No cheating found (I guess if that official minesweeper site accepted it, it should be fine anyway)
Quality of the run: GODLIKE
Timing: The timer in the videos seems correct, and is also the time used on www.minesweeper.info.
Quote:
This is stupid... No one will ever beat this any faster....
Timing: The timing the runner provided is accurate
Timing: The timing the runner provided is accurate
Quote:
Reject for not being the official Minesweeper that came with Windows 3.1. This is the game I remember, not this newfangled clone. ;P
I guess this is an accepted version, although would this just go under the Minesweeper name? Maybe a link to the official ranking website that lists acceptable versions?
Accepted for being the quickest yet. I remember once getting 8 seconds on intermediate once, and this beats that, so yeah. You win.
I guess this is an accepted version, although would this just go under the Minesweeper name? Maybe a link to the official ranking website that lists acceptable versions?
Accepted for being the quickest yet. I remember once getting 8 seconds on intermediate once, and this beats that, so yeah. You win.
Quote:
If these are (or were) WRs then there's no reason to reject.
A very easy accept, seeing as they blow my times out of the water (73 and 313, respectively).
Quality is fine too.
A very easy accept, seeing as they blow my times out of the water (73 and 313, respectively).
Quality is fine too.
Quote:
Accept the runs because they're good.
And by good I mean that before watching these runs I wouldn't've believed that a human brain exists that can perform the necessary calculations to play minesweeper this fast and accurately.
The comments need sorting (two redundant sets of comments), and nate may have a fit over wmv, but as far as I'm concerned this is an absolutely clear accept.
I would love to hear more from the runner about how many tries this took, what the ratio of luck to calculation is, what mental tricks he uses, etc. This is a darned impressive run.
And by good I mean that before watching these runs I wouldn't've believed that a human brain exists that can perform the necessary calculations to play minesweeper this fast and accurately.
The comments need sorting (two redundant sets of comments), and nate may have a fit over wmv, but as far as I'm concerned this is an absolutely clear accept.
I would love to hear more from the runner about how many tries this took, what the ratio of luck to calculation is, what mental tricks he uses, etc. This is a darned impressive run.
Decision: Accept
Congratulations to Kamil Murański!
Thread title: